|
SUE UNCLE SCAM
IS THERE A LAWYER IN THE HOUSE? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guess what. The federal judges are in the same boat as the taxpaying American public. The government is stealing their retirement money too. All this time, I thought the judges were getting special perks that would prohibit us from suing the government for yearly running off with hundreds of billions in surplus retirement, health care, service and other entitlement money. I apologize for this mistake. It's my fault for not looking into the details of these judicial funds, for not seeing how they were established and how they operate, but instead simply listing them with the 122 gift accounts and other perks that the federal government has set up for themselves. It turns out that the judges have been giving the federal government money for their own retirement and other benefits while the government has been pulling the same dirty tricks it pulls with everyone else's entitlement money. Just like the $82 billion in extra/surplus Social Security money American workers contributed last year, fiscal 2003, the government takes the judge's money, treats it as a surplus, spends it wherever they please, and then dumps nonmarketable bonds in a phony trust fund so it can be repaid again by all taxpayers with interest added. It's absolutely ludicrous that the federal government pretends to borrow surplus entitlement money and then charges the general taxpaying public for its repayment plus interest added at no expense to the government, annual interest that is added simply by handing the trust more bogus bonds every year. They do the same thing with the judge's money. Here's a list of the specific trusts for judges that my trust fund list has been lumping with the 122 trust funds under "Perks and Others" for the federal government. The item numbers refer to their place in the not yet revised list.
And then there are at least three trusts that may or may not involve the judges but certainly warrant further investigation:
There is no money or any viable asset in these so-called trust funds. They hold nothing but nonmarketable bonds left there when the government took the cash and spent it wherever they damn well pleased. These bogus bonds are debt markers against future taxes and, as we know directly from the horse's mouth, can only be cashed-in by (1) raising taxes (2) borrowing from investors (3) taking money from the existing budget's other programs or any combination of these three. In one way or another, the taxpaying public will replace the money originally contributed by the federal judges. It's double taxation plain and simple. This double taxation cashing-in is already happening with several entitlement trust funds and without the general knowledge of the American public or mention by the so-called watchdogs. That constitutes fraud or, at the very least, misappropriation of funds. The Unemployment Trust Fund was drawn down $26 billion last year, fiscal 2003, and continues this year. Because the tax paid by employers was not sufficient to pay all the people drawing unemployment benefits and extended benefits, the federal government turned to the trust fund and month-after-month cashed-in some of the bogus bonds. The taxpaying American public replaced, plus interest, a tax that had already been paid once before by employers, was treated as surplus over the years, and was stolen by the government to use elsewhere. During fiscal 2003, the Beltway Bandits double taxed us $72 billion from entitlement's so-called trust funds. What's going to happen when Social Security has to turn to its $1.5 trillion in these fraudulent bonds? Our forefathers rebelled over a tax on tea and used guerilla freedom fighter tactics to do it. Tactics that today would be labeled terrorism. George Washington would be ranked with Osama bin Laden for crossing the Delaware in the dead of night to catch the enemy sleeping in their bunks on Christmas morning at Trenton. At this point in time, we at least have the choice of attempting to settle this matter peacefully through the judicial system. All we need is a few bulldog lawyers willing to go head to head with the District of Corruption's team, who really haven't a leg to stand on, and the backing of a sufficient number of people prepared to settle things peacefully. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||